Akube Ndoromo
Akube Ndoromo
  • 23
  • 1 556

Video

South Sudan's Best Peace
Views 6810 months ago

Comments

  • Akube Ndoromo
    Akube Ndoromo 10 months ago

    South Sudanese peace is a rubber stamp.

  • Akube Ndoromo
    Akube Ndoromo 10 months ago

    South Sudan’s Best Peace. South Sudan war against North Sudan started 1879-1922, and earned it’s sovereignty, and in 1947 known as Juba Conference was re United to North Sudan by United States and Britain and in 1955 the Anya-nya war broke up until 1972, when the North Sudan succeed to use the South Sudanese against each other, the Anya-nya one took unconditional peace to build up themselves, in 1978 the Anya-nya two raise up, in 1983 the North Sudan came up with another alternative called redivision (Kokora) and managed South Sudan as three regions against each other in this same year SPLM/A raise and joined Anya-nya Two in struggle for federal South Sudan. The SPLM/A was very succefull against North Sudan by demanding federalism for the entire Sudan not only South Sudan and in 2005, North Sudan was defeated idiologically and submit into doctrine of letting South Sudan go before installing federalism into entire Sudan. In this same year 2005, SPLM/A come to an end by consipiracy from Salva Kiir, JCE, North Sudan, Wani Igga, Dr. Riek Machar and Ugandan President in cutting off the head of the snake so that the body will bounds on top of the hole, and that marks the end of SPLM/A. 1-South Sudan peace of September 12, 2018, was an insult to injuries after the terrorist regime committed genocide on December 15, 2013-2018. 2-Juba terrorist fake civil war was created as cover up for the corruption committed against South Sudan GDP and killings of all the smart South Sudanese leaving the country with heads without brain. 3-There is no tribelism in South Sudan it was forced to the weak South Sudanese, but it is not working because South Sudanese tradition of fighting against each other doesn’t mean they hate each and the terrorist regime failed to maintain the conspiracy theory. ’THE 64 TRIBES” must remember that this peace is a rubber stamp by the conspiracy group after killing leader of SPLM/A Dr. John Garang, and giving up the country to this same people whom South Sudanese fought since 1879-2005, so all these heroes sacrifice of their lives and their struggle just washed away in vein, please South Sudanese the answer to that is no because the evil has grouped up themselves now South Sudanese must unite and that unity is stronger than weapons they used in killing South Sudanese. And still if it is difficult we can use federalism which asking each citizen to go to their original area and unite as block with their fellow South Sudanese. 1-“THE 64 TRIBES” collective effort will ask the terrorist regime in Juba to step down or they will be washed out. 2-The Unity is more stronger than carry a gun or killing those who are vocal of the corruption or conspiracy of Juba terrorist. 3-The wok of all “THE 64 TRIBES” is to stop any South Sudanese from directing killings against each other, and that is the biggest weapon that will difeat any South Sudanese enemy nationally and internally. The problem of South Sudan will only be solved or resolved by South Sudanese, the history of South Sudanese is clear they always love each other and the common fights is for having the best girls or having more cattle realizing South Sudanese truth (“THE 64 TRIBES”) leave among themselves is the final peace and the federalism is the best formula for development to curve up the corruption. The future is clear working together is the strongest tool South Sudan have and need to be applied right now to remove all the South Sudanese obstacles. Thanks. Akube Ndoromo Chairman South Sudan United Freedom Fighters/“THE 64 TRIBES’ FACEBOOKS: “SouthSudan Alliances”. Facebook Site “s.sudan liberty”. Email: worikiden@gmail.com Phone: (202) 910-5765. Twitter @ndoromo_akube RU-clip: Akube Ndoromo

    • Akube Ndoromo
      Akube Ndoromo 10 months ago

      The unity starts by you talking to your family and friends.

  • Akube Ndoromo
    Akube Ndoromo Year ago

    The District Court of District of Columbia is the most corrupted Court in United States, locking up people without conviction or crime just to make money and that is a fraud. The leading Judge covering the corruption is Judge Emmett G. Sullivan. Court Room 24A where all the scheme takes place. The only way to stop these corruption and set all the ilegally people sitting in prisons free is to public to get involve.

  • Akube Ndoromo
    Akube Ndoromo Year ago

    SOUTH SUDAN DESTROYED ECONOMY AND STOLEN DOLLA (FACTS: Very important information to know AND HAVE) We the people condemn those who destroy South Sudan economy and its people from GDP to international donations total of approximately $ 43 Billion (43 Billion US Dollars). The SPLM/A Secretary General Gen. Pagan Amum, SPLM/A Vice President Gen. Dr. Riek Machar, SPLM/A Speaker/third Vice President James Wani, SPLM/A President’s advisers JCE and SPLM/A President Salva Kiir are the planners of running system. They dictate who will be appointed into all the positions after changing the system to be a dictatorship. They make the receiver’s list for the funds from the Bank of South Sudan each month. The Bank of South Sudan is under Governor of Bank of South Sudan appointed by president. Blow is Bankers monthly receivers list from 2007-2013, the cars drive by and pick up the ready bags. TITLE NAMES AMOUNT IN DOLLARS AND REMARKS: 1-Gen. Salva Kiir Maryardit 700.4 Million dollars South Sudan President/Dinka. 2-Mr. Kuol Athian 1.2 Billion dollars. Former finance minister/Dinka. 3-Gen. Pagan Amum Okiec 600.1 Million dollars SPLM Former S.G./Shilluk. 4-Dr. Gen. Riek Machar Teny 500.8 million dollars Former Vice President./Nuer. 5-Mr. Anthony Lino Makana 320 million dollars Finance Minister./Zande.. 6-Gen. Salva Mathok Gengdit 250.2 million dollars SPLA former D/COGS for Administration./Dinka. 7-Gen.Taban Deng Gai 250.7 million dollars Unity State former Governor./Nuer. 8-Gen. Deng Alor Kuol 150 million dollars Former Minister for regional cooperation./Dinka. 9-Gen. James Kok Ruea 153 million dollars Humanitarian Former minister. 10-Dr. Luka Biong 114.3 million dollars Former Cabinet Affairs Minister./Dinka. 11-Gen. James Hoth Mai 100.4 million dollars Former Chief of Staff./Nuer 12-Gen. Pieng Deng Kuol 77 million dollars SPLA former D/COGS for Administration./Dinka 13-Dr. Somson Kwaje-late 72.7 million dollars Former minister of Agriculture/Pojulu.. 14-Mr. Shierito Deng 50 million dollars Minister in president office./Dinka 15-Mr. Ather Akuin Chol 47.2 million dollars South Sudan 1st finance minister./Dinka 16-Gen. Kuol Diem 45 million dollars Former D/COGS for Moral orientation. 17-Gen.Nhial Deng Nhial 40 million dollars Former SPLA defense Minister./Dinka 18-Mr. Elijah Malok Aleng 32.1 million dollars Former governor for Central Bank./Dinka. 19-Gen. Oyay Deng Ajak 30.9 million dollars Former minister national security investment/Dinka 20-Gen. Malong Awan 25.5 million dollars N. Bahr Al Gazzel former Governor./Dinka 21-Gen. James Wani Igga 22 million dollars Former Speaker of the Parliament./Bari 22-Dr. Barnaba Marial Benjamin 21.3 million dollars Former Minister of culture and information./Dinka. 23-Gen. Gier Chuang Aluong 21.7 million dollars Former Minister of interior./Dinka 24-Dr. Luka Manoja16 million dollars Former Minister of Health./Bari. 25-Mr. Paul Mayom Akech 11 million dollars Former Minister of Irrigations/water./Dinka 26-Mr. Stephen Dhieu 11 million dollars Upper Nile Former D/Governor. 27-Gen. Majak Agot 10 million dollars Former D/defense Minister. 28-Mrs. Awut Deng Achuil 10.9 million dollars Labor & Human resources Former Minister./Dinka. 29-Gen. Kuol Manyang Juuk 10.3 million dollars Jonglie State Former Governor./Dinka 30-Mr John Luk Joak 08 million dollars Legal Affairs & Justice former minister/Dinka 31-Mrs. Rebecca Nyadeng Mabior 07.2 million dollars Former Minister for Roads and Bridges./Dinka 32-Gen. Madut Biar Yol 07 million dollars Former Minister for Telecommunications. 33-Gen. Kuol Deng Abot 07.7, million dollars Former director for National security. 34-Dr. Justin Yach Arob-late 07.1, million dollars Former Presidential Advisor-late./Dinka 35-Mrs. Nyandeng Malek 06 million dollars Former Governor of Warrap./Dinka 36-Dr. Ann Itto 06.4, million dollars Former minister for rural development./Acholi. 37-Mr. Lorence Prenado 06, million dollars Human right. 38-Mrs. Nunu Kumba 04.2, million dollars Western E. former Governor & Minister./Zande. 39-Gen. Dok Jok 03.8, million dollars Former Upper D/Governor. 40-Mrs. Pricela Joseph 03.7, million dollars. 41-Mrs. Nyalok Tiong Gatluak 03 million dollars Former Minister for wild life. 42-Mrs. Agnes Kwaje 03 million dollars Former Minister Social welfare./Pojulu 43-Mrs. Mary Jerfus Ayak 02.9, million dollars Former minister for labor./Dinka 44-Gen. Abdel Aziz Al-Helo 42.2, million dollars SPLM-North. 45-Gen. Malek Agar 36 million dollars SPLM-N. 46-Gen. Yasir Said Hariman 30.5, million dollars SPLM-N. 47-All the people involved in the corruption and human violations are SPLM/A, those who are not expose because the dollar amount is not out, but are SPLM/A as well. This information from Bank of South Sudan didn’t include monthly salaries or maximum stolen funds, but minimum amount taken and international banks disclose accounts are opened not amounts or names, President’s salary is $60,000.00, a year (Sixty Thousand Dollars a year). These funds were moved from South Sudan through Uganda, Kenya and North Sudan Banks taken in diplomatic bags and deposited in different accounts of their relatives, kids, or close friends. The funds were wired abroad to relatives, kids, or friends’ to buy houses, cars, or drawn the cash and kept in houses abroad. Three figures known in transfer of the funds abroad have multiple passports as diplomats in different names: Moses Lomayat Duku (Pojulu) US Citizen, Anthony Steveson (Dinka Aweil) Vienna Citizen and John Andruga (Maddi) Norwegian Citizen, etc. More South Sudanese were used to take the stolen funds abroad. Some funds are buried under ground in Juba houses. This was what brought December 15, 2013, Riek, Kiir, Pagan, JCE, Igga, all are worried and depress from criticism of international and national communities about corruption, while the poor South Sudanese were moving to Juba in search of good life. They plan to fire Riek, Pagan etc., to complicate the situation of corruption and reinstate them back later and cleared out the poor South Sudanese around Juba area because they make them look bad, and become the “December 15, 2013” “Genocide”. SOLUTION TO GIVE THE COUNTRY BACK TO 64 TRIBES 1-The South Sudanese Commanders are on their way to Juba enforcing the international Armament Embargo and Sanctions. 2-The South Sudanese will help disclosing those who concealed the stolen funds overseas. 3-South Sudan is an internationally Security and economy threat giving bad examples to other countries. 4-The international plan “B” headed by US Ambassador Nikki is good if implemented to avoid human cleansing, and Supported by South Sudanese. 5-The OAU condemns presents Kiir and supports his absents they have to come with alternative. 6-IGAD support peace in South Sudan they have to stop their allies Kenya and Uganda from aiding the civil war. This is the everlasting peace in South Sudan and it must be adopted by all the South Sudanese friends to end the human worse disaster going on. Bless South Sudan. Thanks. Akube Ndoromo 1525 Newton Street NW Washington D.C. 20010 Emails: Worikiden@gmail.com/banjawuromoni@gmail.com Phones: (202) 910-5765. Facebook’s: Akube Ndoromo/Banja Wuromoni Twitter: @ndoromo_akube Likendin: Akube Ndoromo You Tube: Akube Ndoromo You can also Google “Who is Akube Ndoromo” LONG LIVE: SSUDA/SSUOA

  • Akube Ndoromo
    Akube Ndoromo Year ago

    SOUTH SUDAN IS AN INTERNATIONAL THREAT. “THE 64 TRIBES” ARE CALLING FOR INTERNATIONAL MILITARY INTERVENTION. “THE 64 TRIBES” says enough is enough supporting internationally plan “B” since people are dying the only option left is to rescue the few that survive terrorist regime in Juba. The internationally community headed by US Ambassador Nikki executed Armament Embargo and was ignored by the terrorist regime because have enough funds hidden in Juba houses or abroad in the houses. Part of plan “B” sanctions by President Donald Trump as US come out to lead the World, but is not working effectively because they have BILLIONS of DOLLARS hidden all over the World, and Uganda, Kenya is ignoring it, the only alternative left is international military intervention and “THE 64 TRIBES” are capable of ground troops or the infantry to secure the security after that. 1-SALAVA KIIR’S PERSONAL SECURITY; Moses Lomayat Duku US Citizen (Pojulu tribe Central Equatoria), John Adruga Duku Norwegian Citizen, (Madi tribe Eastern Equatoria) Anthony Steveson Vienna Citizen (Dinka tribe Aweill): etc. These guys keep all the budget of S. Sudan National Security and they are responsible for kidnappings of oppositions abroad, killings of terrorist critics and purchase of weapons in black Market. 2-MINISTRY OF DEFENSE; President Salva Kiir, Paul Malong, Lawrence Lual Yor Jr., responsible for all the S. Sudanese defense budget from 2005-2016, and they kept 95% worth billions of dollars for themselves, and they are responsible of sponsoring the civil war to continue forever. 3-ADMINISTRATION; President Salva Kiir, Pagan Amum, Dr. Rieck Machar, responsible for laws of dictatorship and distribution of funds monthly to SPLM/A members not including their wages or budgets of their departments they are responsible for billions of dollars since 2005-2013, they create the civil war to cover up the corruption. 4-PRESIDENTS ADVISORS; JCE (Jieng Council of Elders) James Wani IGGA, Mobutu Momur, Dr. Martin Elia Lomuro and President Museveni of Uganda, President Uhuru of Kenya they want whoever internationally or nationally; oppose, criticize, challenge the administration must be eliminated and many South Sudanese and foreigners died in South Sudan or abroad because of that and the killings are going on. 5-Ugandan Military Air force bombardment of Bor Jongele State and Benitu Unity State in February 2014, using Cluster Bombs also any attempt to push Salva Kiir out Uganda President Museveni will be obstacle to it. International military intervention will create a balance. This terrorist regime is a security threat to the entire World not only to United States and is a disaster for the natives of South Sudan, keeping them without international intervention with all the billions of dollars in their positions, and the power of dollars to buy anybody to pursue their ideology or eliminating opponents is strong and dangerous for the entire World. The need for immediate, steady stabilization work to return millions of displaced residents to their homes and consolidate the security rollback of fake civil war is needed by taking the terrorist regime down. The commanders that are hanging out of Juba are aiding and abetting the ideas of prolonging the civil war status quo for corruption to continue and all of them been there since 2005-2013, the only thing they know is to kill or steal. The South Sudanese that been working with Salva Kiir since 2005-2013 or 2018, are too deform to be reform they only know the language of destruction not construction. The terrorist object of the exercise is to hang on to civil war to cover up the corruption and then drift aimlessly and endlessly to the litigation, music as long as possible hoping that everyone else will collapse from exhaustion and they will win the victory, a total lie because the international community and “THE 64 TRIBES” will not watch S. Sudan terrorist building up strongly and dangerously without being stop. Thanks. Akube Ndoromo 1525 Newton Street NW Washington D.C. 20010 Emails: Worikiden@gmail.com/banjawuromoni@gmail.com Phones: (202) 910-5765 Facebook’s: Akube Ndoromo/Banja Wuromoni Twitter: @ndoromo_akube Likendin: Akube Ndoromo You Tube: Akube Ndoromo You can also Google “Who is Akube Ndoromo”. SSUDA/SSUDOA (S. SUDAN UNITED DEMOCRATIC ALLIANCES -“THE 64 TRIBES”/S. SUDAN UNITED DEMOCRATIC OPPOSITION ALLIANCES)

  • Akube Ndoromo
    Akube Ndoromo Year ago

    Chief DC Circuit Judge David Sentelle, Circuit Judge David Tatel, and Circuit Judge Janice Brown DC Circuit Corruption. In all hate cases the DC Court has power over the Appeals Court of D.C. see Criminal No. 06-019-EGS and Appeal No. 09-5114 D.C. Circuit. Writ of Habeas Corpus 1:2010-cv-1983-DC. Circuit any decision DC Court decided it will be affirmed by DC Circuit or remanded back to the DC Court for final decision. The role of the DC Circuit is almost not count in any judicial procedures in Washington D.C. In case involving Judge Emmett G. Sullivan a graduate of UDC African America (Black) who hate immigrants and the decision will be made based on where the person comes from and in DC Circuit Chief Judge is David Sentelle (White) UNCG where Black Student s where massacred by KKK and Jenice Rogers Brown from California which took long time to Congress to accept her to DC Circuit due to her background of supporting corruptions against immigrants. The only Judge was supposed to be David Tatel of Michigan University and have a good background of law and public service why he support the idea of racism and corruption I don’t know. The Case is about Writ of Habeas Corpus under Title 28 U.S.C. Section 2255 and 28 U.S.C. Section 2241, the Appeals Court of DC Circuit turn as if was a case about slavery under Title 42 U.S.C. Section 1983, and they decide on it that somebody convicted of a crime and serving time Can’t filed under that section and Mr. Ndoromo was sent to prison without being sentenced. This case has been filed back to DOJ Civil Rights Division for accountability all the evidence whereby Mr. Ndoromo was guilty because he is an immigrant not because he committed a crime. You can find this case in Facebook Bang Green Taban Facebook Page Group; “Justice4James & Stop Government Robberies”. You can also find it in RU-clip and LinkedIn“Akube Ndoromo”. Mr. Ndoromo will be working on visiting congress Judicial Committee and hear from them what do they think about Washington D.C. Court and Circuit believe that a person can be sent to prison without being found guilty or sentence based on his immigration background of nationalist not crime. Akube Ndoromo 1525 Newton Street NW. Washington DC 20010 Phone; (202) 910-5765. Email: Worikiden@gmail.com Facebook “Bang Green Taban; Facebook Page Public: “Justice4James &stop Government Robberies”. Twitter: “ndoroomo_akube; LinkedIn: Akube Ndoromo You Tube “Akube Ndoromo”.

  • Grace Lado
    Grace Lado Year ago

    Sad news and shame to our president and his government,innocent blood young generations included women and men all died because of money. But enough is enough he is not a president,he is a criminal person he need to step down

  • Jobickson Modi
    Jobickson Modi Year ago

    Sadly, all this money was flushed down the drain without visible development in those leaders home states or in Juba. How many individual factories or estates could this money has done in South Sudan? I am currently ashamed to reclaim that I am a south Sudanese owing to this.

  • Akube Ndoromo
    Akube Ndoromo Year ago

    There are people dying in South Sudan a new country in East Africa been killed by the people supposedly to be the Government officials , I am appealing to International community support to stop the genocide that is going in South Sudan. You can find more details ate; Facebook; " SouthSudan Alliances" or Facebook Group page "s.sudan liberty". Thanks.

  • Akube Ndoromo
    Akube Ndoromo Year ago

    The JCE/SSTG, Kiir, Wani. Taban, have everything about South Sudan. 1-They have all the S. Sudan resources and GDP. 2-They have all the Government contracts and jobs. 3-They have South Sudanese, Kenyan/Ugandan women. 4-They killed all the kids, women, and the poor. Still they are not happy and want cleared all the Nuer out, and it is not enough and extended it to; Kakwa, Kuku, Zande, Acholi, Pojulu, still they are not satisfy, and sold the country to the foreigners Kenya/Uganda still is not enough for them, they extended it to Ghanaians and the Arab countries where they were turned down. Still they are not happy, what is exactly is going on with these people called South Sudanese, but turned out to be fake. This same group create a propaganda in the social media talking about other things; like who will be the next president, why South Sudanese are mad about S. Sudan joining Arab leagues, they are inserting difference between tribe to tribe, confusing the rebels of being in different groups, but I will tell you the patriots are going to push these terrorist out of the country. The way to success and stop killing civilians is already been discovered; just move all cadres to Juba and that is where the enemy is at, and don’t let them come out or go in. We who are following them our volunteers get stranded in zones of Kenya, Uganda, South Sudan we need some little help like last year’s contribution. South Sudanese contributed 1,200.00 (one thousand two hundred) last year to help our volunteers keep up about all kind of information to protect the public and you will contribute by; (1) Money Order, or Personal Check send to US Post Office address below, or by Money Gram to this same name and address below. If you want public to know about your contribution it will be made public if not it will be personal. This same like last year. Thanks. Akube Ndoromo 1525 Newton Street NW Washington D.C. 20010 Emails: Worikiden@gmail.com/banjawuromoni@gmail.com Phones: (202) 910-5765/(443) 882-0333. Facebook’s: Akube Ndoromo/Banja Wuromoni Twitter: @ndoromo_akube Likendin: Akube Ndoromo You Tube: Akube Ndoromo You can also Google “Who is Akube Ndoromo”.

  • Akube Ndoromo
    Akube Ndoromo Year ago

    Judge Emmett G. Sullivan Scheme of underground killing immigrants in Washington DC. Federal Court. Using the Government robberies and stealing s. .

  • Akube Ndoromo
    Akube Ndoromo Year ago

    They day Judge Emmett G. Sullivan locked up Mr. Ndoromo for 51 months before the second court of Appeal in New York make them free him or answer his Appeal Writ of Habeas Corpus 1:2010-cv-01984-DC Circuit. Many things fall apart: (a) Mr. Ndoromo’s mother died of heart attack when heard the news (b) all the refugees sponsor by VSCA Inc. became stranded, (c) Mr. Ndoromo’s children became homeless in Cairo Egypt (d) Mr. Ndoromo sister also died of the heart attack when heard the news. Mr. Ndoromo was locked up in DC Jail from March 30, 2007, to 2008, and then transferred to MDC Brooklyn New York until November 2011, when he was set free. He was told to report to Half Way House because his paper work will be prepared there plus he will have a temporary place to stay until he get a job or get himself together. Mr. Ndoromo went to Half Way House and found out it is technically a jail, in a week Mr. Ndoromo decline to stay there and they lock up Mr. Ndoromo for two weeks, Mr. Ndoromo demanded to be taken to court why he was locked up and they release him telling him to go to court next day and end up with somebody called probation officer telling him to report to him every week for one year Mr. Ndoromo told him no and he filed a motion to court under Judge Emmett G. Sullivan, whatever happened they had to leave Mr. Ndoromo alone. This is the part of scheme to prostrate Akube Ndoromo until collapse. Since then there were people deployed against Mr. Ndoromo in the streets, he always will find his back beg stolen any time he falls asleep, or attacked and robbed all the paper work IDs gone, it takes months or more to get another documents, every month Mr. Ndoromo will be admitted to Hospital from being attacked in DC nights by unknown individuals. It took Mr. Ndoromo three years to come out from being attacked by unknown individuals every night. And protect the paper work from being stolen and at last it is filed to DOJ Civil Rights Division all the unknown attackers disappeared when they learn the issue is already filed under DOJ Civil Rights Division. This is the scheme that is going on in Washington DC Federal Court covered up by Judge Emmett G. Sullivan. Criminal No. 06-cr-019-EGS: Writ of Habeas Corpus 1:2010-cv-01984-DC Circuit. Need public support to end up Judical corruption in Washington DC Federal Court. Thanks. Akube Ndoromo

  • Akube Ndoromo
    Akube Ndoromo Year ago

    Appeal No. 11-5327 Washington DC. Cir. Deputy Chief of Health Care Patricia Square, cleared Ndoromo from health care fraud, also Government's expert Witness, employed with or working at U.S. Justice Department in Washington DC cleared Mr. Ndoromo from false statement, wire fraud and money laundry. Judge Emmet G. Sullivan gets his Judgment from corruption bribes. Which he been doing it all the time according to him he just finish another not long ago.

  • Akube Ndoromo
    Akube Ndoromo Year ago

    THE DAY MR. NDOROMO WAS ILLEGALLY LOCKED UP MARCH 30, 2007 TO NOVEMBER 2011. The trial ends on March 29, 2007, the defense counsel Rita Pendry told Akube Ndoromo on March 30, 2007, will be the day he is going to court to hear the declaration of mistrial because the prosecutor committed perjury. Akube Ndoromo went to court and was asked to wait outside before being called because they want sent the case to Petit Jury. In ten minutes Akube Ndoromo saw Juries taken to lunch another ten minutes later some came back and Mr. Ndoromo was called in and told that the Jury found him guilty and locked up for 51 months without sentence before he fought his way out. Judge Emmet G. Sullivan says “There wasn’t anything really in the red book or the federal practice book.” Mr. Austin: “I’ll get the court and defense counsel something. Probably right after the lunch break I’ll be able to get something.” Judge Emmet G. Sullivan, The Court: “what about national origin? Sometimes I give that. Do you want me to give that or not?” The Money Judgment in absents of Akube Ndoromo. “1,856,812.71 which represents the sum of money equal to the total amount of money constituting, or derive from, gross proceeds obtained, directly or indirectly, as a result of health care fraud scheme, in violation of Title 18, United States Code Section 1347; and which represents the sum of money equal to the amount of money involved in money laundering, in violation of Title 18, United States Code Section 1957.”Signed by Judge Emmet G. Sullivan Appeal No. 11-5327 Washington DC. Cir. Deputy Chief of Health Care Patricia Square, cleared Ndoromo from health care fraud, also Government's expert Witness, employed with or working at U.S. Justice Department in Washington DC cleared Mr. Ndoromo from false statement, wire fraud and money laundry. Judge Emmet G. Sullivan gets his Judgment from corruption bribes. Please this case is filed to DOJ Civil Rights division U.S can’t effort Judge like Emmet G. Sullivan in bench helping Government corruption and locking Americans up because of their national background not because of crime and because he was been bribed not because the law say that. The public must get involve to stop Judicial corruption in Washington D.C. Federal courts.

  • Akube Ndoromo
    Akube Ndoromo Year ago

    Violation of US Constitution by Wahington District of Columbia Judge Emmet G. Sullivan and Chief Judge Dc Circuit Senttelle, the case is submitted under DOJ Civil Rights Division but Mr. Ndoromo is seeking for public support to end District Court corruption.

  • Akube Ndoromo
    Akube Ndoromo Year ago

    Judge Emmet G. Sullivan of U.S. District court and Chief Judge Senttelle of U.S. Court of Appeals of District of Columbia Proved out how corrupted the Judicial misconduct going in District of Columbia See Criminal 06-cr-019-EGS and Appeal No. 09-5114-DC Circuit. The due process clause requires the Government to prove beyond reasonable doubt every element of the crime with which In re Akube Ndoromo is charged. If the Government fails to sustain its burden of proof on any element, the defendant must be acquitted”. Since the Government, fails to sustain its burden of prove on all elements In re Akube Ndoromo must be acquitted. See, Lafave and Scott, Criminal Law Section 1.8 (2d ED. 1986); McCormick Evidence Section 336-337. (18 U.S.C. Section 983 CFRA 2000 Also see, U.S. v. Marillo, 158 F.3d 18, 25, (1st 1989). The Judge Emmet G. Sullivan acting with an improper purpose, personally by influencing the Government including making false statements and misleading statements to corruptly violate In re Akube Ndoromo’s proceeding during the criminal case by not acquitting him in reference to Title 18 U.S.C. Sections; 1505, 1518, and 1001. See U.S. v. Kanchanalak, D.D.C. 1999. 37 F.Supp.2d. Judges Failure to Appoint Affective Counsel. On September 05, 2007, the trial Judge told In re Akube Ndoromo that he knew the attorneys he was appointing to represent In re Akube Ndoromo have relationship with Government prosecutors. In re Akube Ndoromo went to trial represented by ineffective attorney in violation of Title 18 U.S.C. Section 3006, A(d)(6), and see Holloway, 435 U.S. at 484, and violation of right to effective assistance of counsel because trial judge failed to investigate claim of possible conflict of interest on part of defendant’s attorney. In addition see, U.S. v. Greig, 967 F.2d 1018, 1022 (5th Cir. 1992) “violation of right to effective assistance of counsel because trial court knew of conflict of interest but failed to conduct further inquiry”. Also see, U.S. v. Gallegos, 108 F.3d 1272 (19th Cir. 1997) “violation of right to effective assistance of counsel because trial court knew of conflict of interest but failed to obtain either waiver or protect right to conflict free representation”. See, Mann v. Thalacker, 246 F.Ed 1092, 1094 (8th Cir. 2001) (“Habeas used to challenge constitutional right to be tried before impartial fact finder when Judge failed to recuse himself”), and see, Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458, 463 (1938) (Sixth Amendment right to counsel in criminal proceedings with holds from federal courts the power and authority to deprive an accused of his life or liberty”). The Civic Center is filled with everything that made District of Columbia such an exhilarating and alarming City-Jostling shouting, joking, cajoling, backslapping, backstabbing, bargaining, dealing favors granted, grudges paid with interest, intermediations, bribery, conciliation, grand gestures, obscene remarks, and the occasional spontaneous act of generosity. The District Court was given “Something”. See trial transcripts March 26, Docket Entry 67, Entry Date November 30, 2007, Page 4 and 5, in reference to Title 18 USC. Section 1505 and 1518. Based on District Court’s comment that the current Ellen C. Epstein is a well “experienced attorney” in Pre-Trial structure and pre-trial structure permits artful attorney attorneys like Ellen C. Epstein, and Jefrey A. Taylor to hide the ball and keep alive hopeless claims, as well as former defense attorney Rita Pendry and David Boss for a much long time than [formerly]. In many ways, contemporary federal litigation is analogous to the dance marathon contests of yesteryear. The object of the exercise is to hang on to one’s client and then drift aimlessly and endlessly to the litigation, music for as long as possible hoping that everyone else will collapse from exhaustion, but it is obstruction of justice and conspiracy to harm. At Id, At 628. Ex parte Yerger, 75 U.S. (8 wall), 99 (1868). According in re Bonner, 151 U.S. 24, 256 (1893): Nelson, 131 U.S. 17, 184 (1889); Ex Parte Parks, 93 U.S. 18, 23 (1876). See, also In re Mills, 135 U.S. 263, 265-69 (1890). See, Petitioner v. Nichols,Supra 203 U.S. at 201; Felts v. Murphy, Supra, 201 U.S. at Rogers v. Peck, 199 U.S. at 433-34, 435 (“When a prisoner is in jail he may be released upon Habeas Corpus when held in violation of his constitutional rights”) See, also in re Converse, 137 U.S. 624, 624-25, 631 (1891) (“unconstitutional conviction and punishment under a valid law would be as violated of a person’s constitutional rights as a conviction and punishment under an unconstitutional law”). See, Ex parte Frank, 235 U.S. 694 (1914) (mem); In re Kemmler, 136 U.S. 436, (1890. Spies v. Illinois, 123 U.S. 131, 164 (1887). If you see, Act of Dec. 23, 1914, Ch. 2, 38 stat. 790 previously, the Supreme Court could not review such decisions at all. In addition See Act Sept. 6, 1916, ch. 448, Section 2, 39 stat. 726” See Darr v. Burford, 339 U.S. at 216-18; Hawk v. Olsen. Supra, 326 U.S. at 276 (“When error, in relation to the federal question of constitution violation, creeps into record, we have the responsibility to review the proceeding”). Need public support this case is under DOJ Civil Rights Division

  • Akube Ndoromo
    Akube Ndoromo Year ago

    Please help defend USA constitution violation by Washington Federal Court of District of Columbia headed by Judge Emmet G. Sullivan and DC Circuit headed by Chief Judge Senttelle. This case has been submitted to DOJ Civil Righjts Division. and also you can see more details at Facebook; Justice4James & Stop Government Robberies.

  • Akube Ndoromo
    Akube Ndoromo Year ago

    The Government violations of Fourth Amendment during search and seize. The Government on December 22, 2004, went with search warrants to In re Mr. Ndoromo’s Apartment not arrest warrant. The Government knocked at the door when in re Mr. Ndoromo was trying to check who was that, the Government forces their way in and had in re Akube Ndoromo under handcuffs naked for two hours, before taken off, but the agents ask In re Akube Ndoromo to be interrogated and was not allowed to answer the phone or move. All these seizure happened to In re Mr. Ndoromo on December 22, 2004. See Johnson, v. Cambell, 332 F.3d 199, 206 (3rd Cir. 2003) seizure found when officer persisted in demanding that person sitting in parked car roll down the window after person initially refused to do so and it became clear that person sitting in parked car roll down the window after person initially refused to do so and it became clear that person could not refuse officers request. Also see, Kamp v. Texas 538 U.S. 626, 630 (2003) “Seizure found when circumstances surrounding encounter with police lead reasonable person to believe he or she is not free to ignore the police and go about his business”. Kimmelan v. Morrison, 477 U.S. 365, 379 (1986) (quoting Stone v. Powell, 428 U.S. 465, 490 (1976) (habeas corpus relief available, although basis for ineffective assistance claim at issue was counsel’s failure to object to admission of reliable and exculpatory evidence seize in violation of 4th Amendment. In re Akube Ndoromo has the right to be secure in his Apartment papers and effects, against unreasonable search and seize. No warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath and particularly describing the places to be search, and the person or things to be seized. The Government violated the search and seizes warrants by seizing the following; (1) VSCA Tax report for 2001-2002. (2) In re Mr. Ndoromo’s Mother approved visa to migrant to United States. (3) In re Mr. Ndoromo’s Fiancé’s Approved visa to United States. (4) In re Mr. Ndoromo’s income Tax reports for all these years. (5) In re Mr. Ndoromo’s medical records. (6) In re Mr. Ndoromo’s old passport. (7) In re Mr. Ndoromo’s personal note books and diaries. (8) In re Mr. Ndoromo’s cash ($600.00) found in the wallet. And bank accounts leaving him without any money to buy food, rental funds or gas. He became homeless eating using food stamps until now. (9) Seize all the VSCA record and VSCA non-profit records. The Government generally was not supposed to exceed the terms of the authorizing warrants making or conducting a search and seize. In addition, the Fourth Amendment that Government actions in the execution of warrant be related to the objectives of the authorized intrusion. If executing officers exceed the scope of a search warrant the seize evidence must be suppressed and the entire case must be thrown away. In U.S. v. Facciolo, 808 F.2d 173, 177-78 (1st Cir.1987) “evidence suppressed because executing officers exceed scope of already over broad warrant authorizing seize of women’s cloths by seizing 2 racks of men’s cloth”. Also see, U.S. v. Coleman, 805F.2d 474, 483 (3rd Cir. 1986) “evidence suppressed because officers exceed scope of warrant authorizing seize of certain financial records by seizing materials not included in warrant”. Also see, U.S. v. Schroeder, 129 F.439, 442 (8th Cir. 1997) evidence suppressed because officers exceed scope of warrant by searching trailer adjacent to property indicated in warrant. Even if some documents seize were within the scope of a warrant authorizing seizure of records of defendant’s business that tended to evidence health care fraud, the conduct of the agents who executed the warrant was so inappropriate as to warrant the exclusion of all evidence seized. One agent Brian Evans testimony was unequivocal in his belief that they did not consider themselves to be limited to seizing business items in health care only, or records that tended to show evidence of violation of the health care fraud statute, and in fact indicated that they intended to seize personal financial records, as mention above, and didn’t intended to limit the financial records, as mention above, and didn’t intended to limit the financial to business records in health care fraud. An unlawful search or seize neither precludes prosecution nor invalidates a subsequent conviction. Instead, usual remedy for a Fourth Amendment violation is suppression of illegally seized evidence. The Fourth Amendment also protects against unreasonable Government seizes of personal property. Seizure of person occurs when, in view of all of the circumstance surrounding the incident, a person reasonably believes he or she is not free to leave an encounter Government official, like in the situation of in re Mr. Ndoromo. The Government, Court and defense counsel conspire to convict In re Akube Ndoromo to lock him up to conceal their robberies. This is how Judge Emmet G. Sullivan help the Government to cover up their robberies. Akube Ndoromo is seeking for public help to remove the Judicial corruption going in Washington Federal District Court and Appeals Court headed by Chief Judge Senttelle. Thanks.

  • Akube Ndoromo
    Akube Ndoromo Year ago

    The Washington District of Columbia Federal Court and DC Circuit are all involve in high corruption and support US Government Robberies. You Can see this case at Facebook: Bang Taban Green; "Justice4James & Stop Government Robberies". This case has been filed to DOJ Division of Civil Rights.

  • Akube Ndoromo
    Akube Ndoromo Year ago

    The Violation of Banking laws and violation of Fifth, Sixth Amendments. The trial ends on March 29, 2007, the prosecutor, Judge, and defense lawyer ends the trial without the second phase of the trial for the petitioner to present the second phase of the trial, to prove his innocents in violation of his Fifth and Six Amendments and see Docket Entry No. 15, 16, 17, entered date November 14, 2006, Docket entry No. 48, 49, Dated on June 01, 2007, Docket entry No. 60, entered dated September 14, 2007, Docket No. 65 entered date November 07, 2007, and Docket entry No. 78, entry dated February 02, 2008. March 29, 2007, the defense counsel told in re Mr. Ndoromo that petitioner could not present the second phase of the trial because the case was a mistrial due to Government failure to prove all elements beyond reasonable doubt. The defense counsel sent the entire In re Akube Ndoromo witnesses home, and send In re Mr. Ndoromo home to come next day for the declaration of mistrial, but ended in one phase trial, and never presented to jury for deliberation and in 20 (twenty) minutes) the result from jury came back with verdict of guilty in all counts presented. Due to the bribe from Prosecutor Mr. Austin to Judge Emmet G. Sullivan and defense lawyer Rita Pendry. In Dyer v. U.S. 23 F.3d 142, 1423 (8th Cir. 1994) “confining fundamental miscarriage of justice to extraordinary instances when a constitutional violation probably has caused the conviction of one innocent of the crime” like In re Mr. Ndoromo. (Quoting McCleskey v. Zant, 499 U.S. 467, 494 (1991); U.S. v. Cox, 83 F. 3d 336, 341 (10, Circuit 1996) confining fundamental miscarriage of justice to colorable showing of factual innocence, like in situation of In re Mr. Ndoromo. The petitioner’s witnesses were sent back without testifying, for those witnesses that complaint had their subpoenas signed and sent to be paid by the court for their coming. Legal Argument The Government knowingly and intentionally seized Eight (8) Bank Accounts Totaling $1.2 Million in reference to Title 18 U.S.C. Section 2113 (a) using illegal warrants in U.S. v. Wilem, 80 F.2d 116, 121-22 (4th Circuit 1996). In violation of Banking Insurances Act 12 U.S.C. Section 1812, and Section 1813. In violation of Health Care Fraud Title 18 U.S.C. Sections 1347, 1035(a) (2) and 982 (a) (7). Also in violation of Wire Fraud Title 18 U.S.C. Section 1343, in violation of Mail Fraud Title 18 U.S.C. Section 1341, and in violation of Money laundry Title 18 U.S.C. Sections 1956, 1957. In violation of Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments, see Superseding Indictment Docket number 3 (three) entry date February 01, 2006, page number 4, (Bank Accounts) Government’s falsely mislead the Grand Jury that In re Akube Ndoromo still have those accounts. The Arbitrary and discriminatory Government: “it is only where enforcement agency exercises discrimination power arbitrarily and unjustly that enforcement of valid regulation becomes violated of this clause” like in situation of In re Akube Ndoromo. See Thompson v. Spear, C.C.A. Texas 1937, 91 F.2d 430, certiorari denied 58 S.Ct. 409, 302 U.S. 762, 82 L. Ed. 592. The constitution rejects those violations in reference to Ninth Amendment, and see, Bill of Rights at Schertz v. Waupaca County, E.D. Wis 1988, 683F.Supp.1551, affirmed 875 F.2d 578. Also see, Groossman v. Gilchrist, N.D. III. 1981, 519 F. Supp. 173 affirmed 676 F.2d 701, (same). Title 28 U.S.C. Section 2255, can be used to challenge incarceration under unconstitutional pretrial imprisonment based on defective, denial of constitutional rights at trial” like In re Akube Ndoromo. See, U.S. v. Bibefeld, 957 F.2d 98, 102-03 (3d Circuit 1992) known reliance by prosecutor on allegedly perjured testimony of Key witness Brian Evans because allegation sufficiently supported, is fundamental defect cognizable under Title 28 U.S.C. Section 2255. See, U.S. v. Dale, 140 F.3d 1054, 1056 (D.C. Circuit 1998) prejudice standard requires showing that errors at trial were of constitutional dimension” like in re Akube Ndoromo W. Ndoromo trial. The trial Judge in this case knows all the disputed evidentiary facts. See, United Sates of America v. $455,273.72 in funds from bank of America DC Civil No. 1:05-cv-00356 (EGS), and Ndoromo v. United States DC Civil No. 1:06-cv-00150-EGS. The trial Court ignores the violation of the United States constitution by Government because the Judge Emmet G. Sullivan was given “something” by prosecutor Roy Austin Jr. This case is filed to DOJ Division of Civil Rights and you can also find this case at Facebook: Bang Taban Green "Justice4James &Stop Government Robberies". Mr. Ndoromo is seeking for public support to stop Judicial corruption or support for bank robberies.

  • Akube Ndoromo
    Akube Ndoromo Year ago

    This case is file to DOJ Division of Civil Rights. It is to explain to American public how bad Federal Court of District of Columbia and the DC Circuit can rob the public and lock up the victims. See Criminal No. 06-cr-019-EGS, Appeal No. 09-5114, Appeal No. 11-5327, and Writ of Habeas Corpus 1:2010-cv-01984-DC Circuit. The leading corrupted Judges are Judge Emmet G. Sullivan and Chief Judge DC Circuit Judge Senttelle. I need public support about these corrupted Court in District of Columbia.

  • Akube Ndoromo
    Akube Ndoromo Year ago

    This case is about Judge Emmet G. Sullivan supporting DOJ robberies of small business banking accounts and he will be given something and also the chief Judge of DC Circuit Sentelle support of Judge Emmet G. Sullivan efforts of encouraging DOJ robberies. See Criminal No. 06-cr-019-EGS, Appeal No. 09-5114, Appeal No. 09-5327, and Writ of Habeas Corpus 1:2010-cv-01984-DC Circuit. Akube Ndoromo is seeking for public support to stop the corruption that is going on. Thanks.

  • Akube Ndoromo
    Akube Ndoromo Year ago

    This case is about Judge Emmet G. Sullivan encouraging DOJ to rob small business banking accounts and he will get something, he then accused the victims falsely and lock them up, the Chief Judge of DC Circuit will support Judge Emmet G. Sullivan's accepantance of bribes from Department of Justice. This case is filled to DOJ Civil Rights Division and see Criminal 06-cr-019-EGS, Appeal 09-5114, Appeal No. 11-5327, and Writ of Habeas Corpus 1:2010-cv-01984-DC Circuit.

  • Akube Ndoromo
    Akube Ndoromo Year ago

    See Government Indictment as follow: 1-Health Care Fraud; Title 18 U.S.C. Section 1347. 2-Mail Fraud Title 18 U.S.C. Section 1341. 3-Wire Fraud Title 18 U.S.C. Section 1343. 4-Convicted in Health care fraud Title 18 U.S.C. Section 982(a)(7) 5-False statement in health care matters Title 18 U.S.C. Section 18 1035(a)(2). 6-Money Laundry Title 18 U.S.C Section 1957. See, “Health care fraud counts in indictment met the constitutional requirements for specificity particular when consider in light of the bills of particulars provided by the Government; health care fraud counts alleged: (1) The time frame of the scheme (2) The scheme’s victims, (health care providers). (3) The perpetrators of the scheme, (in both sides). (4) The place where the scheme was perpetrated from starting location to ending location. (5) The purpose of the scheme, and tracked the language of the statute 18 U.S.C. Section 1347” Or is insufficient. See, U.S. v. Mermelstein, E.D.N.Y. 2007, F.Supp. 2d 1215, and see trial transcripts March 26, 2007, docket entry number 67 dated November 30, 2007, pages 4, 10-11, and 141. Also see the Government Indictment. The Trial is different from the indictment and from the verdict form that was supposed to be submitted or presented to Petit Jury and filed into courts’ records. See the indictment docket entry number 3, Criminal No. 06-cr-019-EGS. “The grand jury clause of Fifth Amendment reads; no person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of grand jury. And indictment, as charging instrument, offers three protections to the accused. First, it must appraise the accused of the charges against him so that he may adequately prepare his defense, and second, it must describe the crime with sufficient specificity to enable him to protect against future jeopardy of the same offense. Gaither v. United States, 134 U.S. App. D.C. 154, 159, 413 F.2d 1061, 1071 (1969); United States v. Miller U.S. 105 S.Ct. 1811, 1814, 85 L.Ed.2d 99 (1985); Also see United States v. Bradford, 482 A.2d 430, 433 (D.C. 1984). In addition to these notice related concerns, the right of indictment by grand jury affords a third safeguard. By guaranteeing the right to be tried only on charges made by the indictment, the clause also protects against oppressive actions of the prosecutor or court, which may alter the charge to fit the proof. Gaither, Supra, 134 U.S. App. D.C. at 159, 413 F.2d at 1061. The prohibition precludes the possibility that the defendant could be convicted on the basis of facts not found by or presented to, grand juries which indict him”. See, Russel v. United States, 369 U.S. 749, 770, 82 S.Ct. 1038, 8 L.Ed. 2d 240 (1962). “An amendment of the indictment occurs when the charging terms of the indictment are altered, either literally or in effect, by prosecutor or court after the grand jury has last passed upon them. A variance occurs when the charging terms of the indictment are left unaltered, but the evidence at trial proves facts materially different from those alleged in the indictment.” The Government: “I can’t remember whether it was Mr. Philip or Mr. Rajj whose transmission blew cost $2,000. Will the defendant pay that for him? No. Absolutely not. The man is sitting on $1.2 Million at the end of the day. He doesn’t have enough money to pay for the transmission on one of his own vans? That is why it was a mistake for these people to work for him. That’s why we are here today.” See indictment docket entry number 3, in Criminal No. 06-cr-019-EGS. Also trial transcripts March 29, 2007, page 76, docket entry 70, entry date November 30, 2007, in D.C. Court. The Government: “Did people get paid without prior authorization codes? That’s in large part probably why we’re here. But that doesn’t excuse that does not excuse stealing, ripping off, taking from Medicaid.” See trial transcripts page 99, docket entry 70, entry date November 30, 2007, in Criminal No. 06-cr-019-EGS, Also see indictment docket entry number 03, entry date February 01, 2006. The Government: “Yes, the government got up here before you and said $1.8 Million and repeated $1.8 Million again and again and again, because that’s the amount of fraud here, that’s the evidence here. It’s $1.8 Million minus about $6,000.” See the indictment docket entry number 3, entry date February 01, 2006, in criminal case no. 06-cr-019-EGS. I am asking the public for help how we can stop Federal Court of District of Columbia from robbing or encouraging DOJ to rob small business banking accounts and they will lock up the victims supported by DC Cicruit Chief Judge Senttelle.

  • Akube Ndoromo
    Akube Ndoromo Year ago

    Akube Ndoromo is asking the public for support to stop Federal Court of District of Columbia and DC Circuit from promoting Government Bank Robberies, and shutting down small business. Also Ask the public to stop Judge Emmet G. Sullivan from his hatred against immigrants and accepting bribes or asking Prosecutors to give him something. The Chief Judge of DC Circuit Senttelle also must bstop accepting bribes from Judge Emmet G. Sullivan.

  • Akube Ndoromo
    Akube Ndoromo Year ago

    The Background of Government obstruction, perjury, and conspiracy Title 18 U.S.C. Section 241. The Government, Court and defense counsel Rita Pendry unlawfully, willfully, and knowingly did corruptly influence, obstruct and impede and corruptly endeavor to influence, obstruct and impede due and proper exercise of power of inquiry by certain specific acts, particular altering, defacing and destroying and withholding the evidence from Jury and from Court’s records. In reference to Title 18 U.S.C. Sections 241, 1505, 1518 and See U.S. v. Presser, N.D. Ohio 1960. 187 F.Supp.64. See, Verdict form Docket Entry Number 36 and 37, Date March 30, 2007, see transcripts March 29, 2007, Docket Entry number 70, entry date November 30, 2007, pages 70, 107-108, 131-132, 141-145. Also, see Transcripts March 26, 2007, in opening statement Docket Entry Number November 30, 2007, pages 127, 149. Government Misleads Petit Jury. The Court: “You may consider only the evidence, which is properly admitted in the case. The evidence undoubtedly will include the sworn testimony of witnesses. It will also include stipulations or other matters about which the court takes judicial notice. If it includes those matters, I will define what those terms mean for you at the appropriate term during the trial.” See March 26, 2007, trial transcripts page 137, Docket entry number 67, Entry date November 30, 2007. The Government and Judge in this case have the entire substantial evidence about the above mention, but they mislead the petit jury because it was a robbery. The defense counsel Rita Pendry failed to object because she was given “something”. The Government and the Court unlawfully, willfully, and knowingly did corruptly influence, obstruct, Impede, and corruptly influence altering defacing, and did conspire to omitted the indictment from petit jury instructions and jury verdict. See U.S. v. Presse, N.D. Ohio 1960. 187 F. Supp. 64. See the court’s instruction on March 26, 2007, Trial transcripts Page 138, Docket entry number 67, entry date November 30, 2007, as follow: The Court denying the defendant from defending himself. The Court: “The Law does not require a defendant to prove his innocence or to produce any evidence. If you find that the government has proved beyond a reasonable doubt every element of an offense with which the defendant is charged, it is your duty to find him guilty of that offense. On the other hand, if you find that the government has failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt any element of an offense with which the defendant is charged, you must find the defendant not guilty of that offense”. See trial closing instructions March 29, 2007, page 107-108 docket entry number 70, and entry date November 30, 2007, as follow: The Court: “And right now I’m going to instruct you that and I just misplace some of this paper, that there are certain counts in the indictment that you need not consider and you need not speculate as to any reason why you shouldn’t consider them. And, quite frankly, I have misplaced what I just wrote down. Actually, they’re counts two, three, four and five and seventeen and eighteen. The reason why I mention that is because you’ll see numerical gaps on the verdict form, you won’t see those numbers. That’s because you don’t need to focus on those counts in the indictment. And just for clarity sake, when we send the indictment back, you won’t even see reference to those numerical counts, just so that there’s no confusion. So again, there are counts two, three, four and five and counts seventeen and eighteen that you need not give further consideration to”. See trial closing instructions March 29, 2007, page 107-108 docket entry number 70, and entry date November 30, 2007. More recently, in United States v. Miller, Supra, the Supreme Court distinguished between an indictment alleging an offense different or broader from that establish at trial and an indictment means of committing the offense different from those established at trial. The former, it held, constituted an impermissible variance. Miller was charged with defraud his insurer both by consenting to a burglary and by lying to the insurer about the value of his loss. While only the latter allegation was proved at trial, the court held it insufficient to sustain a conviction. In another words, to successfully resist offense proved at trial and fully alleged in the indictment. See, Miller, supra, 105 S.Ct. at 1816.8. With regard to amendment which infringe on a constitution right to grand jury indictment, the Supreme Court has adopted a per se reversal rule. See Ex parte Bain, supra, 121U.S. at 1; Baker v. United States, 373 A2d 1215, 1218 (D.C. 1977). The question that In re Ndoromo and public will ask is, what was that something, that given to Judge and Defense Counsel to allow a fatally defective and empty indictment to be presented before Jury? The Government falsely misleads the jury. “Well, first, you will see the checks going into the defendant’s account for the most part, except For when on occasion he decided to buy something for himself, such as a Land Rover, a $40,000, car he paid $35,000 cash for. And at the end of the day after law enforcement officers Seized that money there was still $1.2 Million sitting in the defendants’ accounts”. See trial transcripts March 26, 2007, Docket Entry number 67, page 149.

  • Akube Ndoromo
    Akube Ndoromo Year ago

    This case is now in DOJ division of civil rights and in Facebook: "bang Green" and Justice4James & Stop Government Robberies. That is how the DOJ shutting down small business and benefiting from their funds illegally in Washington DC Federal Court and DC Circuit.

  • Akube Ndoromo
    Akube Ndoromo Year ago

    This case is now in DOJ division of civil rights and in Facebook: "bang Green" and Justice4James & Stop Government Robberies. That is how the DOJ shutting down small business and benefiting from their funds illegally in Washington DC Federal Court and DC Circuit.

  • Akube Ndoromo
    Akube Ndoromo Year ago

    Beginning of the trial on March 26, 2007, docket entry number 67, entry date November 30, 2007, pages 4 &5. The court: Actually, I have money laundering false statement related to healthcare, the wire fraud. What we have done is kind of tracking the language of statute for the healthcare fraud and the false statements related to healthcare matters. I don’t know if you have something more comprehensive than that or not. I can show you both what we have. There wasn’t anything really in the red book or the federal practice book.” Mr. Austin: “I’ll get the court and defense counsel something. Probably right after the lunch break I’ll be able to get something.” Government robbery of $1.2, million from the banks and $800,000, from Health Department and Two vehicles all belonging to Akube Ndoromo and VSCA Inc. (1) Key Witnesses in Mr. Ndoromo's case; Deputy Chief of Health Care Patricia Square cleared In re Mr.Ndoromo from health care fraud. (2) Expert Witness, working with U.S. Justice Department in Washington DC cleared In re Mr. Ndoromo from false statement, money laundry and wire fraud. (3) The Court found the prosecutor Roy Austin Jr. committed perjury (4) The Indictment is different from evidence presented in the trial. (5) The verdict form is different from Indictment and from evidence presented in the trial. (6) The petit juries were dismissed without voting to the verdict form. (7) In re Ndoromo was sitting outside the court seeing the Juries taken to lunch few of them came back in less than ten minutes In re Mr. Ndoromo was called and locked up that the jury found him guilty? The petitioner as Pro se moves this Honorable Department of Justice Civil Right Division for the United States of America challenging District Court for the District of Columbia corruption and ruling of June 18, 2008, denying Section 2255 in open Court. The Court: “I will tell you in your face that Section 2255 is denied since you favor Appeals Court you file to them to review your section 2255”, but that reaction was vindictive, and please see transcripts on June 18, 2008, in open Court. The order from United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit file on June 12, 2008, and was filed to District Court on June 13, and In re Mr. Ndoromo received on June 18, 2008, in open Court the District Court Judge ruled on Section 2255 denying Section 2255 that lacks merits: Court Reporter: Jackie Sullivan. In re Akube Ndoromo is petitioning United States Government for violations of robberies in bank accounts shutting down business, and laid people out of job. The officials involved are: Ex. Attorney General Kenneth L. Weinstein, Ex. Attorney General Jeffrey A. Taylor, Prosecutor Roy Austin Jr. Prosecutors; Ellen C. Epstein, Judge Emmet G. Sullivan, Magistrate Judge John M. Facciola, etc. and DC Circuit support of robberies in holding In re Akube Ndoromo unconstitutional in custody for 51 months and shutting down his business for 14 years etc., after robberies.. See United States v. $455,273.72 in Funds from Bank of America civil Action No. 1:05-cv-00356-RGS. Ndoromo v. United States of America. (1) The Court denied In re Ndoromo from defending himself. (2) The Court claim that the law doesn’t allowed the defendant to present his evidence. (3) The Judge and defense counsel were given “something” by the Government. Even before Brady, the Supreme Court created duty for the prosecutor to disclosed perjured testimony, due proses is violated any time perjured testimony is procured by the prosecutor. See Mooney v. Holoham, 294 U.S. 103 (1935); Howthorne v. United States, 504 A.2d 580, 589-90 (D.C. 1986) United States v. Cuffie, 80 F.3d 514 (D.C. Circuit 1996). Solicitation of the perjury is not required; even when the perjury comes completed on the whim of the witness of the prosecutor knows it is false; there is a duty to disclose. See Alcorta v. Texas, 355 U.S. (1957). Government and Court contend that Section 2255 was supposed to be filed after sentencing but see, Rule 1 of Title 28 U.S.C. Section 2255; (1) “1 year period of limitation shall apply from the date on which judgment of conviction”. (2) “ the date on which the impediment to making a motion created by government action in violation of the constitution or laws of the United States of America is removed, if the movant was prevented from making a motion by such Government action. (3) In re Mr. Ndoromo was in custody under a wrong judgment of that court who seeks immediate release (4) the Judgment violated the constitution and the laws of the United States (5) The Court lack Jurisdiction to enter the Judgment or taking In re Akube Ndoromo to trial because he was the victim. See Smith v. United States, 2005 WL 1313445, (June 1, 2005). “Because the petitioner has not timely filed his Section 2255 challenge within the applicable statute of limitations. The Court denies the petitioner’s motion for relief”. Government failed to answer Section 2255, See Docket Entry Number 89, dated May 09, 2008, and see the Reply In re Akube Ndoromo Docket Entry Number 92 entry date June 07, 2008. The case is not really conducted according tp the law.

  • Akube Ndoromo
    Akube Ndoromo Year ago

    The Judge personal is forcing the Prosecutor to continue with the case and later he will ask for something which the bribery. The Judge personal encourage Government prosecutor to give him something you see in the beginning of trial.

  • Akube Ndoromo
    Akube Ndoromo Year ago

    The Judge personal is forcing the Prosecutor to continue with the case and later he will ask for something which the bribery. The Judge personal encourage Government prosecutor to give him something you see in the beginning of trial.

  • Akube Ndoromo
    Akube Ndoromo Year ago

    Motions hearing before trial. March 21, 2007 Ms. Pendry: “Well, I submit to the Court that what we have here is sort of callous disregard to peoples’ rights with these teams coming in, storming people’s apartments 10 and 12 agents at a time, to execute search warrants in a white collar crime case and storming people’s apartments”. The Court: “What are they supposed to do? They don’t know who’s on the other side of the door, they don’t know whether-I mean, they were investigating a pretty significant alleged theft here, what, over a million dollars or so”. The Court: “We can do that. I just finished one. It was wire fraud. What is this, mail fraud”? Mr. Austin: “Healthcare, mail, wire.” The Court: “all right. What’s the government offering in this case”? Mr. Austin: “I honestly cannot recall the specific offer. It was a very generous offer”. The Court: “tell me what it is”. Mr. Austin: “I don’t have my paper work. The Court: what was his voluntary guideline? Do you recall what it is”? The prosecutor didn’t answer the judge question about the offer. The Court: “maybe that’s too powerful. Maybe I should just reject it as not being persuasive. I find the law enforcement officer’s testimony more persuasive at this point.” It may well be that a Jury of his peers will find to the contrary, I don’t know. But I find that the law enforcement officers, both, are more credible at this point than either the defendant and/or his witness, a former employee”. The Government: “For the reason the Government would ask that all three of the motions, the motion to suppress evidence, the motion to suppress statements, and the motion to dismiss the indictment, all be rejected”. The Court: For the record, I will at this point deny the motion to treat the motions as conceded. That’s denied. With respect to the remaining three motions Ms. Pendry, why should I credit your client and disbelieve the law enforcement”. Ms. Pendry: “I am sorry, you’re Honor”? The Court: “why should I credit your client and reject the testimony of the law enforcement officer?” The Court: “what about national origin? Sometimes I give that. Do you want me to give that or not?” See, protection of citizens: to all persons within the territorial jurisdiction, without any difference of race, color, nationality, and equal protection of the law is a pledge of the protection of equal laws. Yick WO v. Hopkins, Cal. 1886 6S.Ct 1064 118 U.S. 369, 30 L. Ed. 220. Also, see Wormen v. Moss, 1941, 29 N.Y. S. 2d 798, 177 Misc. 19. See, motions hearing transcripts March 21, 2007, docket entry number 66, dated as November 30, 2007, pages 130-143. Further see Superseding Indictment date February 01, 2006, docket entry number 3 (three). The Government and the District Court want to conceal the Government’s illegally interception of VSCA Inc. funds for three (3) months; August, September, October. Totaling about $875,000, illegally shutting business of VSCA on December 22, 2004, without Court order, using illegally warrants seized banking accounts totaling $1.2 Million, misleading the Grand Jury that the Government never seizes funds, or shut down business of VSCA Inc. or intercepted funds. See motions hearing March 21, 2007, Docket entry Number 06, Entry dated November 30, 2007, pages 130-139. Superseding Indictment Date February 01, 2006, Docket entry number 3, page 9, the indictment is different from the evidence presented in the trial, and different from the verdict form that never made to the petit jury.

  • Akube Ndoromo
    Akube Ndoromo Year ago

    In re Akube Ndoromo’s business was shut down on December 22, 2004. The VSCA, Inc. Non-profit running transportation under Health care Department has: (1) Eight permanent employees. (2) Four part time employees (3) Earning minimum of $275,000, a month. (4) Earning maximum of $325,000, a month. (5) Making $3.9, Million a year. (6) In fourteen years $54.6 Million. (7) Seized funds $1,856,812.71. (8) Two Vehicles Land Rover $40,000, and 18 Passage van Chevrolet $35,000. In Re Akube W. Ndoromo was lock up for 51 months without sentence before the Second Court of Appeal force Federal Court of District of Columbia to release him. Akube Ndoromo was taken out of work since December 22, 2004-2018, etc. (1) He was making minimum of $40,000, a month (2) Making maximum of $55,000, a year. (3) Locked up for 51 months, and fourteen years out of work. . (4) In Fourteen years total of $9.2, Million. Prosecutor Robert Bowman resigned from Criminal No. 06-019-EGS, and he said “I can’t take innocent man to trial”. The corrupted attorney General Kenneth L. Weinstein took the case and assigned another corrupt Prosecutor Roy Austin Jr. the case was under corrupted Judge Emmet G. Sullivan. The first Defense Counsel David Boss step down from the case, according to him he can’t understand what kind of case is this, Judge Emmet G. Sullivan appointed another corrupt defense counselor Rita Pendry.

  • Akube Ndoromo
    Akube Ndoromo Year ago

    The Washington Federal Court and DC Circuit of District of Columbia is focusing on robbing the small business by DOJ and they will cover it. The Chief Judge of DC Circuit Sentelle and Judge Emmet G. Sullivan are the top Judges in covering up robberies by Government. See Criminal No. 06-cr-019-EGS, App. 09-5114, App. 11-5327, and 1:22010-cv-01984-DC Circuit. Also Facebook: Bang Green or Justice4James & Stop Government Robberies.